Baseline vs Humanloop
Humanloop and Baseline both help teams judge and improve their AI. The difference is the loop: Baseline turns each evaluation into a Rubric you re-run on a Schedule and hand to an Optimization Run that rewrites the prompts for you — so improvement is automatic, not another task on someone's plate.
Why teams choose Baseline
- Score AI outputs against a Rubric your whole team can read — no notebook required.
- Put quality on autopilot: a Schedule re-runs your evaluations and flags regressions before customers do.
- Let an Optimization Run rewrite weak prompts for you, then prove the lift against the same Rubric.
Baseline and Humanloop, side by side
| How they compare | Baseline | Humanloop |
|---|---|---|
| Rubric-based scoring of AI outputs | Weighted criteria authored in the UI; every Eval Run returns one overall score the whole Team can read. | Provides evaluators including human and LLM-as-judge, managed in its UI. |
| Scheduled, recurring evaluations | A Schedule re-runs a Rubric on a cadence against a connected System and surfaces regressions automatically. | Runs evaluations from the SDK or CI; recurring runs are wired up by the user. |
| Automated prompt optimization | An Optimization Run searches for better prompts and proves the lift against the same Rubric. | Focuses on prompt management and versioning; prompt changes are author-driven. |
| Who it's built for | Non-technical and technical teammates share one workspace; Readonly Members can view results without editing. | Aimed at product and engineering teams collaborating on prompts. |
| Getting started | Free tier with no credit card; create a Rubric in the browser. | See Humanloop pricing for current plans and trial details. |